Total Pageviews

Thursday, April 14, 2016

URANIUM (LEU) FUEL BANK

The Uranium (LEU) fuel bank is a physical reserve of up to 90 metric tons low enriched uranium (LEU) suitable to make fuel for a typical light water reactor, which is the most widely used type of nuclear power reactor worldwide. Low-enriched uranium (LEU) has a lower than 20%  concentration of Uranium-235 or ( LEU is the basic ingredient to fabricate nuclear fuel). It's made by enriching naturally occurring uranium to improve its ability to produce energy. Enrichment increased the concentration of atoms that can be split to produce heat; heat in turn is used to genrrate electricity and it will be stored in the uranium fuel Bank will be enriched up to 4.95%, suitable to make fuel for a typical light water reactor. LEU can safely stored and transported in strong steel sylinders. it's does not deteriorate and can be safely strored for many years. 
The world suffers no shortage of uranium, the raw material for nuclear energy and nuclear wapons. the Amount of electricity genreated globally by nuclear power peaked amount a decade ago. And no reactors have ever been shut down of lack of fuel. Investers lile Warren Buffett has put the first $50m behind a $150m project on August 2015  to build a uranium bank in Kazakhstan, the world's bigest producer of mineral. it sounds like something a Bond villain might dream up, rather than a philanthropic American billionaie. ThoughThere has been a nuclear non-proliferation treaty since 1970, there is nothing to stop countaries enriching uranium for civilian purposes, But from North Korea to Iran, questions are constantly asked about whether uranium-enrichment facilities built ostensibly to produce low- enriched uranium (LEU) for nuclear power are in fact thinly disguised bomb-making kits- enabling the fuel to be spun into the more highly enriched forms used in nuclear weapons. for two decades the world has agonised over whether Iran's centrifuges were producing more of the uranium-235 isotope than was needed for nuclear power, posing a threat to the world. LEU is available on the open market, but if supply unexpectedly dries up, the bank in Kazakhstan can act as a lender of last resort. To ensure the fule's safety and that it is distributed fairly when the bank opens in 2017, the bank will be owned by the international Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a global nuclear watchdog based in Vienna, but opreated by kazakhstan. its uranium will be available only to IAEA members, and will contain 90 tonnes of LEU rather than the "weapons-grade" form. That is enough to power a 1,000-megawatt reactor taht could power a large city for three years. There is some symbolism to the bank being in Kazakhstan. The country says it was the site of 45 devastating nuclear tests when part of the former Soviet Union. it gave up its own nucler srsenal in 2001, yet remains the world largest uranium producer. The bank will be located in the northeastern city of Oskemen, a centre for nuclear fuel production for 60 years.

No doubt, excuses to to build more centrifuges will persist. Many countries ascribe international prestige to having uranium-enrichment facilities. Some, like Japan, have the capacity quickly to turn LEU into weapons-grade materal. Rogue nations rail at unfairness of being left out the club of nuclear-weapon states. Moreover, no nuclear-power provider will need the bank's services imminently; the World Nuclear Association says uranium supply has expanded significantly in the past decade, prices have slumped, and reactors have become more efficient. yet any country enbrking on a civilian nuclear programme need only look at Russia's stranglehold over gas supplies to Western Europe to appreciate the imporrtance of having a secure LEU backstop. If the Kazakh bank helps to limit the number of centrifuges spinning around the world, it may be one of Mr Buffett's best investment yet. 






Sunday, April 3, 2016

INDIAN DEMOGRAPHIC DIVIDEND

This theory is known as the "demographic dividend" a phrase coined by demographer David Bloom. He proposes that when young working-age adults comprise a disproportionate percentage of a country's population, the national economy is affected in positive ways.

Demographic dividend is defined as rise in the rate of economic growth due to a rising share of working age people in a population. This phenomenon occurs with a falling birth rate and the consequent shift in the age structure of the population towards the adult working ages. It is also commonly known as the demographic gift of bonus of demographic window.

   Evolving demographics unambiguously point out that India will remain a  young nation and the largest contributor the next few decades because of rapidly ageing population in the Western countries, and Chin's one-child policy.
A young population is India's demographic dividend. It gives India the potential to become a global production hub as well as a large consumer of goods and services. Further, since the age-group of 45-60 years is the key contributor to household savings, India's savings rate, which has increased rapidly in the decade, will get a further boost thereby supporting investment. 
India, world's second largest populated country after China, has 17.5 percent of world's population. With India's population forecast to grow at 1.0 percent  per year, significantly faster than that of China at 0.4 per cent per year, India will become the most populated country in the world by 2030. India's population is likely to rise from 1.21 billion  in 2010 to 1.48 billion by 2030, and further to 1.6 billion by 2050.
By 2050, according to an International Labor Organisation Paper, The Percentage of people above the age of 65 will be 39 per cent in the U.S., 53 percent in Germany and 67 percent in Japan. India, by contrast will have only 19 per cent above age 60.
According to the Census of India, while the proportion of population in the under 14 age group declined from 41 percent in 1961 to 35.3 percent in 2001( that is, by 5.7 percentage points), the proportion of population in the age group 15-59 increased from 53.3 percent to 59.9 percent ( that is, by 3.6 percentage points) during the same period. The proportion of those above 5.6 percent to 7.4 percent ( that is, by 1.8 percentage points). In terms of absolute numbers, the increase in the 15-34 age-group population is even more dramatic; from 174.26 million (31.79 per cent) in 1970 to 354.15 million (34.43 per cent) in 2000.